Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 70894 articles
Browse latest View live

White House counsel Don McGahn is out

$
0
0

Donald McGahn

  • White House counsel Don McGahn left the Trump administration on Wednesday, a source with knowledge of the situation said to Business Insider.
  • President Donald Trump floated the idea of replacing McGahn with attorney Pat Cipollone, a Justice Department veteran, earlier this week.
  • McGahn's departure adds to a long list of exits from the Trump administration. The turnover has already broken records fewer than two years into Trump's first term.

White House counsel Don McGahn left the Trump administration on Wednesday, a source with knowledge of the situation said to Business Insider.

McGahn was said to be on his way out of the White House, which was expected to happen after the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

McGahn reportedly had a 20-minute farewell meeting with President Donald Trump on Wednesday, in the interest of ending things on an amicable note, according to a source cited by CNN.

"Typically you would have the incumbent stay until the successor was ready to take his place," the source told CNN. "But in this case McGahn was tired of the President and the President was tired of McGahn."

Another source disputed that claim and said McGahn wanted to stay with the administration until after the midterm elections in November, according to CNN.

Donald McGahn Trump

McGahn's departure adds to a long list of exits from the Trump administration. The turnover had already broken records fewer than two years into Trump's first term.

Despite playing a critical role in Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court, McGahn's relationship with the president appeared to fray in recent months, according to multiple news reports.

McGahn was reportedly frustrated with Trump's "volcanic anger" and abrupt eruptions. He had previously described the president as "King Kong" behind his back, according to The Times. McGahn was also viewed as a check on Trump's impulsive actions, and as a result, found himself attracting the president's ire.

Trump was incensed after special counsel Robert Mueller was appointed to lead the Russia investigation in 2017, and he reportedly threatened to resign rather than carry out Trump's order to fire special counsel Robert Mueller in June 2017.

Trump is also believed to have blamed McGahn, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions, for the ongoing Russia investigation and the probe into possible collusion between Trump's 2016 election campaign and the Kremlin.

As the Russia investigation dragged on, reports that McGahn spent at least 30 hours testifying to the special counsel sent Trump and his close confidants into a tailspin.

Trump floated the idea of replacing McGahn with attorney Pat Cipollone, a Justice Department veteran, earlier this week.

Cipollone, who currently practices in a Washington, DC-based law firm, was reportedly working with Trump's legal team in recent months and has extensive experience with crisis management, consumer fraud, and constitutional issues.

Trump described Cipollone as "a very fine man, highly respected by a lot of people."

SEE ALSO: Don McGahn is out — here are all the casualties of the Trump administration so far

DON'T MISS: 'I don't think he has any money': Trump taunts Michael Avenatti after legal win and discounts his potential 2020 presidential bid

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory


Don McGahn is out — here are all the casualties of the Trump administration so far

$
0
0

Trump cabinet resignations_10.9.18

White House counsel Don McGahn left the Trump administration on Wednesday after a tumultuous 21-month tenure, a source close to the administration told Business Insider on October 17.

The administration has been rocked by high-profile departures — including Reince Priebus as chief of staff and James Comey as FBI director — since Trump took office in January 2017.

Here are all the top-level people who've either been fired or resigned from the administration, and why they left:

SEE ALSO: Trump's staff turnover is higher than any administration in modern history

DON'T MISS: MEET THE CABINET: Here's who Trump has appointed to senior leadership positions

Don McGahn

White House counsel Don McGahn left the Trump administration on Wednesday after a tumultuous 21-month tenure, a source close to the administration told Business Insider on October 17.

McGahn was said to be on his way out of the White House, which was likely to happen after the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.



Nikki Haley

Nikki Haley, the US Ambassador to the United Nations and former governor of South Carolina, announced her resignation on Oct. 9th.

After Axios first reported the news, President Donald Trump announced to reporters in the Oval Office that Haley would resign at the end of 2018.

While the reason for her resignation was unclear, Trump said she previously told him she wanted to "take a break" after serving in the post for two years.

Haley was considered a moderating, stable force in the Trump cabinet who supported a strong US presence in the UN, sometimes at odds with National Security John Bolton, who takes a more hawkish stance on foreign affairs.

Appearing beside Trump in the Oval Office, Haley touted making progress on issues including trade and nuclear disarmament in Iran and North Korea. Trump praised Haley's work, saying she could "have her pick" of roles if she wanted to return to the White House. 

Haley also put to rest speculation that her resignation meant a presidential run for her in 2020. 

"No, I am not running in 2020," she said. 



Scott Pruitt

Trump announced in a tweet on July 5 that he had accepted embattled Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt's resignation.

"Within the Agency Scott has done an outstanding job, and I will always be thankful to him for this," Trump wrote.

At the time of his resignation, Pruitt was the subject of several federal ethics investigations for his lavish spending habits, his suspected conflicts of interests with lobbyists, and for reportedly enlisting his official government staff to carry out his personal errands.

Democratic lawmakers accused Pruitt of using staff to get him a Trump tower mattress, to try to get his wife a position managing a Chick-fil-A franchise, and to find his family a new apartment in a posh DC neighborhood.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

In final Washington Post editorial, Jamal Khashoggi contemplated a 'freedom he apparently gave his life for'

$
0
0

jamal khashoggi

  • An op-ed Jamal Khashoggi filed right before he went missing earlier this month was published online by The Washington Post on Wednesday evening.
  • In the column, the Saudi journalist discussed the need for a free press in the Middle East.
  • "Arab governments have been given free rein to continue silencing the media at an increasing rate,"Khashoggi wrote.
  • His Washington Post editor said his final article is a testament to his commitment to a "freedom he apparently gave his life for."
  • Khashoggi disappeared after entering the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul on October 2, and is feared dead.
  • Turkish officials have accused Saudi Arabia of killing Khashoggi, who was often critical of the Saudi government in his reporting, in the consulate.

An op-ed Jamal Khashoggi filed right before he went missing earlier this month was published online by The Washington Post on Wednesday evening.

In the column, the Saudi journalist discussed the need for a free press in the Middle East.

"Arab governments have been given free rein to continue silencing the media at an increasing rate. There was a time when journalists believed the Internet would liberate information from the censorship and control associated with print media," Khashoggi wrote. "But these governments, whose very existence relies on the control of information, have aggressively blocked the Internet."

Khashoggi called for the creation of an "independent international forum" to allow ordinary people in the Arab world to address "the structural problems" their societies face.

"The Arab world is facing its own version of an Iron Curtain, imposed not by external actors but through domestic forces vying for power," Khashoggi added. "The Arab world needs a modern version of the old transnational media so citizens can be informed about global events. More important, we need to provide a platform for Arab voices."

Karen Attiah, Global Opinions editor at The Post, wrote a note at the top of Khashoggi's newest article:

"I received this column from Jamal Khashoggi’s translator and assistant the day after Jamal was reported missing in Istanbul," Attiah said. "The Post held off publishing it because we hoped Jamal would come back to us so that he and I could edit it together. Now I have to accept: That is not going to happen."

Attiah added, "This is the last piece of his I will edit for The Post."

Khashoggi's editor said his final article "perfectly captures his commitment and passion for freedom in the Arab world. A freedom he apparently gave his life for."

Attiah said she's "forever grateful" she had the chance to work with Khashoggi and he chose The Post as his "final journalistic home."

Khashoggi disappeared after entering the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul on October 2. There's no footage of him leaving the building.

Turkish officials have accused Saudi Arabia of brutally killing Khashoggi, a Saudi national who often criticized the Saudi government in his reporting.

The Saudi government has vehemently denied these allegations, but after more than two weeks, still hasn't provided any definitive proof Khashoggi is alive and safe.

Jamal Khashoggi

Khashoggi had a rich, complicated career before he went missing.

As a young reporter, he traveled to Afghanistan to interview Osama bin Laden, who at the time was among CIA-backed militants fighting the Soviet Union. Khashoggi also covered the Gulf War, and his time as a foreign correspondent quickly propelled him into a successful career as a journalist and editor in Saudi Arabia.

The media industry in Saudi Arabia is strictly controlled by the government, which meant Khashoggi developed close ties to the country's leadership over the years. He eventually served as an adviser to the royal family.

But he began to fear for his safety last year as Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman moved to consolidate power, arresting fellow princes and businessmen — including friends of Khashoggi.

After he was critical of President Donald Trump and the Saudi government's apparent trust in the US leader, the royal family barred Khashoggi from writing. Six months later, in June 2017, Khashoggi left for the US.

Prior to his disappearance, Khashoggi split his time between the US state of Virginia, Istanbul, and London, and was a US resident with a green card. He wrote a number of articles for The Washington Post after leaving Saudi Arabia.

The Saudi journalist was weeks away from getting married to his Turkish fiancée, Hatice Cengiz, when he went missing. Khashoggi went to the consulate on October 2 to obtain documents that would allow his marriage to move forward. Cengiz waited outside for Khashoggi for roughly 11 hours, but he never returned.

Khashoggi in the past said he always considered himself a patriot, viewing his criticism of the Saudi government as a sign of his love for Saudi Arabia and a desire for conditions there to improve.

In a recent op-ed for The New York Times, Cengiz wrote, "Jamal was a patriot. When people referred to him as a dissident, he would reject that definition. 'I am an independent journalist using his pen for the good of his country,' he would say."

Cengiz added, "His voice and his ideas will reverberate, from Turkey to Saudi Arabia, and across the world."

"Oppression never lasts forever. Tyrants eventually pay for their sins."

READ MORE:

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory

Facebook has 'tentatively' concluded that spammers, not foreign agents, are to blame for the biggest hack in its history (FB)

$
0
0

mark zuckerberg facebook ceo

  • Facebook has "tentatively" concluded that spammers pretending to be a digital marketing firm are responsible for the biggest hack in the company's history, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.
  • Anonymous sources told the WSJ that the company does not believe a nation-state was involved. 
  • The hacker stole personal information of 29 million Facebook users.

Facebook believes that spammers, and not a nation-state, are responsible for a devastating recent hack that stole the personal information of 29 million Facebook users, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday.

The report, which cites anonymous sources, says that Facebook has "tentatively" concluded the hackers were spammers who were posing as a digital marketing company. 

The hack, which Facebook first disclosed in September, is the largest breach suffered by the social network. The hackers were able to exploit vulnerabilities in Facebook's code to get their hands on "access tokens"— essentially digital keys that give them full access to compromised users' accounts — and then scraped users' data.

Among the user data stolen by hackers were birthdates, phone numbers, search history and even recent locations the users had "checked in" at. 

Facebook and other social media services have increasingly been targeted by malicious actors seeking to use the platforms to spread misinformation and wreak other havoc. Facebook has said it believes Russian operatives were behind a campaign to spread misinformation ahead of the 2016 US Presidential elections.  

The fact that criminal spammers, presumably with commercial motives rather than a political agenda, are behind the recent hack is an unexpected development, though it's unlikely to quell some of the mistrust the company has earned from a large segment of users.

Interestingly, Facebook noted in an update last week that the FBI had asked it not to publicly discuss "who may be behind this attack."

A Facebook representative referred Business Insider to the company's statement from a week ago when it disclosed certain details of the incident: "We are cooperating with the FBI on this matter. The FBI is actively investigating and have asked us not to discuss who may be behind this attack."

Read more about the massive Facebook hack:

Hackers stole millions of Facebook users' personal data — here's why you should be worried

Here's how to check if you were affected in the Facebook hack — and how to delete your Facebook account

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Apple unveil the new iPhone XR, XS, and XS Max

Kobe Bryant says he's 'disappointed' to be removed from animated-film festival panel over 2003 sexual-assault allegations

$
0
0

kobe bryant oscar

  • Basketball legend Kobe Bryant has been asked to step down from a judges' panel for an animated film festival set to begin in Los Angeles this weekend.
  • An online petition that called for Bryant's ouster from the panel cited a sexual-assault allegation he faced in 2003. The charges in that case were dropped after Bryant's accuser decided not to testify.
  • Bryant was the target of similar criticism after he won an Academy Award earlier this year for the animated short film "Dear Basketball," which was adapted from a poem Bryant wrote as part of his farewell message to the NBA.

Basketball legend Kobe Bryant has been asked to step down from a judges' panel for an animated film festival set to begin in Los Angeles this weekend, the Los Angeles Times reported on Wednesday.

An online petition that called for Bryant's ouster from the panel cited a sexual assault allegation he faced in 2003. The charges in that case were dropped after Bryant's accuser decided not to testify.

Bryant won an Academy Award earlier this year for the animated short film "Dear Basketball," which was adapted from a poem Bryant wrote as part of his farewell message to the NBA. In a statement to Variety on Wednesday, Bryant said he was "disappointed" by the decision.

"This decision further motivates me and my commitment to building a studio that focuses on diversity and inclusion in storytelling for the animation industry," Bryant said.

Festival creator Eric Beckman said Bryant's exclusion was meant to keep the attention around the event focused on the accomplishments of its participants.

“We are a young organization and it is important to keep our collective energies focused on the films, the participating filmmakers, and our festival attendees,” Beckman said.

Bryant said he was disappointed to be cut from serving on the jury, but that he would remain dedicated to "changing the world in positive ways."

Bryant wrapped up his NBA career in 2016 with five championship wins under his belt with the Lakers.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What it takes to be an NFL referee

The Secret Service is defending an agent who physically prevented a journalist from questioning Jared Kushner

$
0
0

Jared Kushner

  • The Secret Service said that one of its agents who was captured on video Tuesday physically blocking a reporter from questioning White House senior adviser Jared Kushner was acting in "response to an abrupt movement from an unknown individual."
  • CBS reporter Errol Barnett told CNN on Wednesday that he was trying to ask Kushner about the mysterious disappearance of the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi when the Secret Service agent covered Barnett's phone and prevented him from speaking to Kushner.
  • Kushner, who is also President Donald Trump's son-in-law, reportedly has a close relationship with the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. The prince has reportedly denied having any knowledge of the circumstances surrounding Khashoggi's disappearance.

The Secret Service defended an agent who physically prevented a reporter from questioning White House senior adviser Jared Kushner as he boarded a commercial flight.

The agency said the agent was acting in "response to an abrupt movement from an unknown individual who later identified themselves as a member of the media."

The announcement comes after a video emerged on Tuesday showing one of its agents covering up CBS News correspondent Errol Barnett's phone as he tried to ask Kushner about the mysterious disappearance of the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

"Jared Kushner did not answer my question and the secret service informs me, while obscuring my phone, that despite identifying as WH press, there is a “time and a place” for questions. It is unclear when and where that is," Barnett said in a tweet that included video of the encounter.

Barnett responded to the Secret Service's statement in an interview with CNN on Wednesday.

"Now, you can see in the video, the very first thing I say is who I am and who I’m with, and I’m wearing the name of my channel around my neck, so you can make what you think of that statement, but from the Secret Service perspective, they don’t think this officer did anything wrong," Barnett said.

Kushner, who is also President Donald Trump's son-in-law, is said to enjoy a close relationship with the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who himself has denied any involvement in Khashoggi's disappearance.

Khashoggi, a longtime Saudi critic, has not been seen since he entered the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul, Turkey, on October 2, and he is feared dead.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory

Saudi Arabia paid the US $100 million on the same day Mike Pompeo visited Riyadh to discuss Jamal Khashoggi's disappearance

$
0
0

pompeo salman saudi khashoggi

  • The US received a payment of $100 million from Saudi Arabia on the same day that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visited Riyadh to meet with Saudi leaders on the investigation into journalist Jamal Khashoggi's disappearance.
  • US officials denied that the payment had anything to do with Pompeo's visit or Khashoggi, though a source told The New York Times that the timing of the deposit "was no coincidence."
  • Khashoggi, a longtime Saudi critic, has not been seen publicly since he walked into the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul, Turkey, on October 2. He is feared dead.
  • Trump previously said Saudi Arabia would face "severe punishment" if evidence points to Saudi leaders having been involved in harming Khashoggi, but his administration has softened its stance in recent days, touting the Saudi royals' repeated denials and even casting doubt on reported Turkish audio and video evidence.

The US received a payment of $100 million from Saudi Arabia on the same day that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visited Riyadh to meet with Saudi leaders to discuss the investigation into Jamal Khashoggi's disappearance.

"The timing of this is no coincidence," an American official involved in Syria policy told The New York Times. He confirmed the money arrived on Tuesday.

The payment, first reported by The Times, was pledged in August as part of American efforts to stabilize parts of Syria, but at the time, it was not immediately clear if or when the money would show up.

The sudden cash windfall raised some eyebrows on Wednesday, given the ongoing investigation into Khashoggi's disappearance, but US officials denied that the swift transfer of cash between Saudi Arabia and the US had anything to do with Pompeo's visit to Riyadh.

"The specific transfer of funds has been long in process and has nothing to do with other events or the secretary’s visit," said Brett McGurk, a US envoy cited by The Times.

Trump claimed he had "no financial interests in Saudi Arabia" after facing criticism for his response to Khashoggi's case. However, Trump's businesses have made millions from the Saudi government and the crown prince have his New York City hotel a huge boost, Business Insider's Bob Bryan reported on Tuesday.

Saudi officials have repeatedly denied involvement in Khashoggi's disappearance, and have been quiet about the details of their own investigation.

Pompeo declined to get into specifics as well, telling reporters during his visit: "I don’t want to talk about any of the facts; they didn’t want to, either, in that they want to have the opportunity to complete this investigation in a thorough way."

But Turkish officials claimed to have discovered evidence of a crime inside the consulate where Khashoggi was last seen.

Trump last week vowed Saudi Arabia would face "severe punishment" if evidence implicates Saudi involvement in Khashoggi's disappearance, but his administration has softened its stance in recent days — even casting doubt on reported Turkish audio and video evidence.

Earlier this week, Trump likened the global pressure on Saudi regime to allegations of sexual assault leveled against Brett Kavanaugh during his Supreme Court confirmation.

SEE ALSO: Even if Saudi Arabia is behind Jamal Khashoggi's murder, experts say sanctions against Riyadh could backfire

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory

The 10 most important things in the world right now

$
0
0

mike pompeo saudi arabia

Hello! Here's what's happening on Thursday.

1. A top US Senate Democrat slammed Trump's response to journalist Jamal Khashoggi's alleged killingSen. Chris Murphy said President Donald Trump has made the US look "weaker" than ever by kowtowing to Saudis.

2. UK Prime Minister Theresa May offered to extend the Brexit transition period by another yearThe offer means the UK may not cut its ties with the EU until December 2021.

3. Saudi Arabia paid the US $100 million on the same day US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visited Riyadh to discuss Jamal Khashoggi's disappearanceUS officials denied that the payment had anything to do with Pompeo's visit or Khashoggi, though a source said the timing was "no coincidence." 

4. Apple is distancing itself again from Google and Facebook with a new privacy websiteApple is increasingly highlighting its pro-privacy policies versus its rivals Facebook and Google.

5. An Amazon staffer says over 450 employees wrote to Jeff Bezos demanding Amazon stop selling facial-recognition software Rekognition to policeRekognition has come under fire in the past amid allegations that it infringes on people's civil rights. 

6. Powerful Facebook investors co-filed a proposal to take down Mark Zuckerberg as chairmanA similar proposal in 2017 was popular among independent investors but crushed because of Zuckerberg's voting power.

7. Germany extradited a man suspected of murdering a Bulgarian journalistViktoria Marinova was jogging in a park in her hometown of Ruse, Bulgaria when she was raped and murdered.

8. 19 people were killed in a shooting at a college in Russian-annexed CrimeaAn 18-year-old student ran fired at students before killing himself. His motive remains unclear.

9. A caravan of thousands of Honduran migrants is traveling through Central America trying to reach the US borderPresident Trump has been lashing out for days at the Honduran government, the US immigration system, and Democrats over the caravan's movements. 

10. A British teen on a mission to become the youngest person to cycle solo around the world had his bike stolen in Australia. The 18-year-old has travelled through Europe and Asia since embarking on an eight-month journey in July. 

And finally...

The 32 most corrupt countries in the world

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why horseshoe crab blood is so expensive


10 things in tech you need to know today

$
0
0

Mark Zuckerberg

Good morning! This is the tech news you need to know this Thursday.

  1. Facebook has "tentatively" concluded that spammers, not foreign agents, are to blame for the biggest hack in its history. Anonymous sources told the Wall Street Journal that the company does not believe a nation-state was involved.
  2. An Amazon staffer says over 450 employees wrote to Jeff Bezos demanding Amazon stop selling facial-recognition software to police. An anonymous Amazon employee demanded in an op-ed article on Medium that the company stop selling its facial-recognition software, Rekognition, to police forces.
  3. Twitter released more than 10 million tweets linked to state-sponsored troll accounts. Twitter has released a huge swath of data linked to foreign influence and misinformation campaigns ahead of the US midterm elections in three weeks.
  4. Four powerful institutional Facebook investors co-filed a shareholder proposal to split Mark Zuckerberg's dual role as CEO and chairman. New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer, Illinois State Treasurer Michael Frerichs, Rhode Island State Treasurer Seth Magaziner, and Pennsylvania State Treasurer Joe Torsella are joining forces to pile the pressure on Zuckerberg.
  5. Saudi Arabia is walking away from a deal with Virgin Hyperloop, the Financial Times reports. The move comes after Virgin Group chairman Richard Branson said he would suspend working with the Kingdom in the wake of Jamal Khashoggi's disappearance.
  6. Tesla's vice president of manufacturing, has left the company, according to a source familiar with the matter. Gilbert Passin joins a long list of high-level employees from all parts of the automaker who have made their exit.
  7. The maker of "Fortnite" is suing two YouTubers for trolling with cheats and sharing hacks. The lawsuit, filed in a North Carolina district court, claims that cheat software damages the experience of "Fortnite" players, and harms the game's community as a result.
  8. Apple stores are now selling a $2,000 "self-flying" drone you can control from an Apple Watch. The startup behind the quadcopter was founded by former MIT students, and it's backed by some of technology's elite investors.
  9. Uber may spin off its self-driving car unit as it races to go public. Uber is considering selling off stakes in its Advanced Technologies self-driving unit as it races towards a 2019 IPO, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday.
  10. Tesla says Elon Musk plans to buy $20 million worth of stock as soon as possible. The plans were announced the day after a judge approved Tesla and Musk's settlement with the US's top stock regulator.

Have an Amazon Alexa device? Now you can hear 10 Things in Tech each morning. Just search for "Business Insider" in your Alexa's flash briefing settings.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Apple unveil the new iPhone XR, XS, and XS Max

Theresa May offers to extend the Brexit transition period by another year

$
0
0

theresa may brexit transition

  • Theresa May tells EU leaders that she would be willing to extend the Brexit transition period by another 12 months.
  • The offer means the UK may not cut its ties with the EU until at least December 2021.
  • May's offer is reportedly dependent on the EU dropping its demands for the Northern Ireland Brexit "backstop.
  • Prominent Brexiteers condemned the offer as meaning UK may "never leave at all."
  • EU leaders in Brussels agree there has not been enough progress to hold a summit in November.

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM — Theresa May has told European leaders she is prepared to extend the Brexit transition period by another year, keeping the UK tied to EU rules and regulations until at least December 2021.

The UK prime minister told a meeting of EU leaders in Brussels on Wednesday evening that she would be willing to accept a longer transition period— or "implementation period"— in order to unlock Brexit negotiations.

Under current plans, the UK will stay in the EU's customs union and single market for 21 months after Brexit day, giving it time to prepare businesses, borders, and many other areas of British life for leaving the EU.

However, May told EU leaders that she'd consider accepting a transition period lasting 33 months, meaning the UK wouldn't completely depart the EU until at nearly six years after the 2016 referendum.

However, the offer is reportedly dependent on the EU abandoning its plans for the Northern Ireland "backstop" which could keep the province within EU customs and trade rules indefinitely if the UK fails to secure an alternative arrangement before the end of the transition.

Speaking to the BBC on Thursday, May said she was open to extending the transition by a number of months but said that she hoped that doing so wouldn't be necessary.

The offer was met with an immediate backlash from prominent Brexiteers, with Conservative MP Nadine Dorries calling on May to stand down and make way for David Davis as leader.

"If Theresa May is asking for a longer transition period, she is stalling," Dorries tweeted.

"It’s time to stand aside and let someone who can negotiate get on with it and deliver. I fully support DD as an interim leader. I’ve done my bit. It’s time for my colleagues to do theirs."

Her colleague John Redwood MP said that any extension would be "unacceptable".

Meanwhile, Leave campaigner and former UKIP leader Nigel Farage tweeted that "Mrs May’s acceptance of an extension to the transition period will take us to the next general election which may mean we never leave at all."

November Brexit summit off

May addressed leaders of other EU member states on Wednesday evening on the first day of the European Council summit. European leaders paid respect to May's positive tone but said there had not been enough progress in Brexit talks to schedule another council summit in November.

A provisional deal collapsed on Sunday after the UK refused to accept the EU's proposal for Northern Ireland to remain in the single market and customs union as part of the "backstop" for preserving the frictionless Irish border.

May said this proposal was unacceptable as it would create an array of new customs and regulatory checks between Northern Ireland and Great Britain, consequently undermining the constitutional integrity of the UK. 

Michel Barnier

Michel Barnier, the EU's chief Brexit negotiator, reportedly mooted the idea of offering the UK government a longer transition period last week. This, Barnier believes, would reduce the likelihood of the backstop ever being used.

A spokesperson for the prime minister refused to categorically rule out an extended transition period earlier on Wednesday, telling reporters in Westminster: "We're not calling for an extension to the implementation deal."

It is doubtful whether pro-Brexit MPs would accept a longer transition period. It would mean an additional 12 months of the UK paying into the EU budget and following EU rules, like the free movement of people. Pro-Leave Conservative MP Peter Bone told ITV on Wednesday night that extending the transition would be a "silly" and "absurd" idea.

May also has to please the Democratic Unionist Party which props up her fragile government. The DUP has said it will not sign up to any backstop clause which would create new checks between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK. 

The prime minister will be in Brussels until Friday in an attempt to make progress in Brexit negotiations.

Barnier told reporters that negotiators needed "much more time" to reach a deal. Officials have said a deal could be struck as late as the European Council's December summit, with both sides determined to avoid no deal. 

European Parliament President Antonio Tajani, who was among a number of EU officials addressed by May on Wednesday, said that while May expressed "goodwill," she didn't say "anything substantially new."

SEE ALSO: Trump tells May to abandon 'unjustified' food standards for Brexit trade deal

DON'T MISS: Theresa May's government accused of lying about '30 Labour MPs' backing her Brexit deal

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory

Mike Pompeo reportedly warned Mohammed bin Salman 'global pressure' will force Trump to deal with Jamal Khashoggi's disappearance if the Saudis don't step up

$
0
0

mike pompeo saudi arabia

  • US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo reportedly delivered a stern warning to Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman during a meeting in Riyadh on Tuesday, urging him to "own" the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi, who has not been seen publicly since he entered the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul, Turkey on October 2.
  • An unnamed source familiar with his meeting told CNN that Pompeo told bin Salman "every fact is going to get out," and floated the possibility that "his future as king" would depend on how he handles the situation.
  • Publicly, the Trump administration on Wednesday continued to tout a "strong denial" from the Saudis that they had any involvement in Khashoggi's disappearance, despite mounting clues to the contrary.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo reportedly delivered a stern warning to Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman during a meeting in Riyadh on Tuesday, urging him to "own" the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi, who has not been seen publicly since he entered the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul, Turkey on October 2.

An unnamed source familiar with his meeting told CNN that Pompeo told bin Salman "every fact is going to get out," and floated the possibilty that "his future as king" would depend on how he handles the situation.

The top US diplomat Pompeo also emphasized that bin Salman needs to be more forthcoming about the incident "even if the crown prince didn't know about it beforehand," CNN reported,

The account paints a different of the meeting, during which Pompeo was pictured smiling broadly while meeting with Mohammed bin Salman and other Saudi officials.

Pompeo reportedly issued a blunt warning that, if the crown prince doesn't step up, the US will have to "take action because the world will demand it," CNN's source said, adding that "President Trump's hand will be forced by the global pressure."

Publicly, the Trump administration on Wednesday continued to tout a "strong denial" from the Saudis that they had any involvement in Khashoggi's disappearance, despite mounting clues to the contrary.

When asked for details on what he and the Saudis discussed during their meetings, Pompeo said,"I don't want to talk about any of the facts, and they didn't want to either."

SEE ALSO: One of the people believed to have been involved in Jamal Khashoggi's disappearance reportedly identified as frequent travel companion of Mohammed bin Salman

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales: There's going to be an 'enormous backlash' against Donald Trump's lies

We tried a luxury seafood banquet served in a four-poster gold bed

$
0
0
  • You can get a seafood banquet served in bed.

  • The feast includes Jersey and Poole rock oysters, a black caviar burger, a 1.5 pound Nova Scotia lobster, and king crab legs.

  • It costs £65 ($86) per person.

 

Burger & Lobster in London installed a four-poster king size bed into it's Soho restaurant.

Guests get a seafood feast served in the bed that includes Jersey and Poole rock oysters, a black caviar burger, a 1.5 pound Nova Scotia lobster, and king crab legs.

The bed can be booked for two to four people at £65 ($86) per person.

Produced and filmed by Claudia Romeo

Join the conversation about this story »

China's stocks are plunging again — falling 3% to near 4-year lows as trade jitters return (SHCOMP)

$
0
0

China Stocks Man

  • Chinese stocks fall to their lowest level since November 2014 as market turmoil returns.
  • At the close of play in China, the Shanghai Composite — the country's benchmark index — fell by more than 2.9%.
  • The sell-off doesn't appear to have a single driver, with trade war fears, slowing growth, and the impact of forced selling all being blamed.
  • You can see more of what happened in China on Thursday at Markets Insider.

Chinese stocks plunged once again on Thursday as fears about the trade with the US brought turmoil back to the country's markets following a few brief days of respite.

At the close of play in China, the Shanghai Composite — the country's benchmark index — fell by more than 2.9%, dropping to its lowest level since November 2014. Other indexes, including the Shenzhen Composite, and the FTSE China A50 also nursed losses in excess of 2%.

The sell-off was broad-based, with just about every sector trading in the red.

Elsewhere in Asia there were also losses, although significantly smaller. Hong Kong's Hang Seng dropped 0.4%, while Japan's Nikkei 225 was 0.8% lower.

Thursday's drop means that the Shanghai Composite has now fallen more than 30% since January, placing it deep into bear market territory.

There doesn't appear to be a single catalyst for Thursday's fall, with analysts variously citing a knock-on effect from the falls seen on Wall Street on Wednesday, and resurfaced concerns about the US-China trade war, as reasons for the sharp sell-off.

One theory is that the steep declines could reflect the continued impact of forced selling given the large and growing slide in stocks this year.

According to Bloomberg, about 4.18 trillion yuan, or $603 billion worth of shares have been put up by company founders and other major investors as collateral for loans, accounting for about 11% of the country’s stock market capitalization, based on calculations using China Securities Depository and Clearing Corporation data.

As stocks have fallen pledged shareholdings risk being liquidated to settle outstanding debts, creating a spiral effect of selling pressure.

Falling stocks may also reflect rising concerns about the future of Chinese growth after several warnings from across the board in recent days. On Tuesday, for instance, ratings agency S&P Global warned of a hidden debt pile in the country worth as much as $6 trillion.

The debt, concealed off-balance-sheet by the country's local governments, is an "iceberg with titanic credit risks," according to the authors of the report.

Away from China, European stocks are mixed in morning trade, with the Euro Stoxx 50 broad index lower by around 0.3%, but most other indexes trading marginally higher. Britain's FTSE 100 is 0.3% higher, while Germany's DAX has risen 0.5%.

David Scutt contributed reporting

SEE ALSO: Chinese stocks are cratering again

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What activated charcoal actually does to your body

Theresa May told to resign after making 'outrageous' offer to extend Brexit transition for another year

$
0
0

Theresa May

  • Theresa May faces a furious backlash from Conservative MPs after offering to extend the Brexit process by up to another year.
  • The proposed 12-month extension would cost billions of pounds in EU fees and leave Britain under European rules for almost six years after the referendum result.
  • Conservative MPs call on May to abandon her plans and make way for a new leader.
  • The prime minister tells the BBC the extension would only be a "matter of months" and insists she hopes it won't be needed.

 

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM — Theresa May is suffering a major backlash from all wings of her party after telling EU leaders she is willing to extend the Brexit transition period by up to 12 months in an attempt to unlock negotiations.

The concession, delivered to EU leaders at a dinner in Brussels on Wednesday night, means that Britain may not fully leave the auspices of the EU until the end of 2021, while potentially putting billions of pounds more into EU budgets.

Speaking to the BBC on Thursday, the prime minister said she hoped that no extension would be needed but acknowledged that it may be necessary to lengthen the transition period by a "matter of months."

Doing so would lengthen the time available to agree a future trade deal with the EU as well as give more time to prevent a hard border with Northern Ireland. However, it would come at both a political and financial cost of up to £10 billion in additional EU fees.

Back in Westminster, MPs from all sides of the Brexit debate reacted angrily to May's announcement.

Staunch Brexiteer Nadine Dorries urged MPs to oust May as Conservative party leader and prime minister if she accepts a longer transition period.

"It’s time to stand aside and let someone who can negotiate get on with it and deliver. I fully support David Davis as an interim leader. I’ve done my bit. It’s time for my colleagues to do theirs," she tweeted.

Pro-Brexit Conservative Bill Cash said a longer transition would be "completely outrageous" adding that it would force the UK to "pay potentially tens of billions of pounds on top of what's already been agreed" to the EU, while his colleague John Redwood described it as "unacceptable."

Pro-EU Tory MPs reacted negatively, too. One leading Conservative Remainer told BI: "It's daft. It doesn't resolve any of the underlying issues and keeps us in a painful Brexit holding pattern."

Nick Boles MP went further, telling the BBC that May's handling of negotiations is driving MPs who once supported her "to despair" and "losing the confidence of colleagues of all shades of opinion" on Brexit.

Michel Barnier

Not all Conservative MPs have woken up on Thursday morning furious with the prime minister, however.

One pro-EU MP who sits among the Conservative "rebels" told BI they support the idea in principle. "I'm happy with it if it facilitates a deal and solution to the backstop. If not, what's the point?" they said.

Perhaps crucially for May, a member of the pro-Brexit European Research Group said they wanted to give her time to navigate through "this delicate stage of negotiations" before jumping to conclusions.

"I want to see what the outcome is and the detail," they told BI.

A senior Labour source said, "We’ve not called for any extension and the only reason it’s being discussed is because of the abject failure of the government’s negotiating."

They added: "We’ve always said that the transition should be as short as possible but as long as necessary."

Analysis: May has little choice but to extend.

Theresa MayMay's suggestion that she'd be willing to extend the Brexit transition period by up to one year has predictably led to outrage among Conservative MPs and cries of "I told you so" from the opposition.

However, in reality, the prime minister had little choice but to ask for an extension. The two year transition period was never going to be long enough to conclude negotiations over a free trade deal with the EU. Such huge international negotiations can take the best part of a decade to conclude — Canada's free trade deal with the EU took eight years to finalise — and are not usually conducted in anything like the urgent circumstances the UK faces.

Failure to successfully conclude such a negotiation within two years would leave Britain in a cliff-edge scenario both economically and politically, with a the prospect of a hard border in Northern Ireland and the break-up of the UK a real and present threat. May's proposal to extend this period is therefore entirely sensible, even if the realisation that such an extension is needed has come very late in the process.

However, an extension does not in and of itself solve May's problem, which is that she has yet to fully decide, let alone agree, what sort of relationship she wants to secure during that additional transition period. Her so-called Chequers plan has already been rejected both by the EU and her own party and the prime minister has not even begun the process of spelling out which of the alternative available options she is willing to accept. Furthermore, the EU side believes the only way to preserve the frictionless Irish border is for Northern Ireland to remain closely wedded to the EU on a permanent basis. Northern Ireland can either do this alone or with the rest of the UK. Neither would be supported by the House of Commons.

From the start of this process the EU has made it clear that Britain can either have a close Norway-style relationship with the EU, or a much more distant Canada-style agreement. The first option would be by far the least economically damaging but would come at the political cost of accepting EU rules permanently, while having little say over what those rules are. The second option would produce a big economic hit to, but would allow Britain the kind of "clean" break from the EU that many in her party are demanding. Neither option is a good one for May, but she has to make that fundamental choice.

Until she does so, no amount of extra transition time will do anything but delay the reckoning she faces.

SEE ALSO: Theresa May offers to extend the Brexit transition period by another year

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory

‘If you want to worry about something, this is it’: Central banks and investors are warning about the $1 trillion boom in 'leveraged loans'

$
0
0

bubble

  • The Bank of England yesterday raised concerns about the growth in so-called “leveraged loans” — credit given to risky companies by private lenders.
  • But the BoE is not alone in being alarmed. Australia’s central bank and the Bank of International Settlements have also noted the soaring use of leveraged loans, which now stand at more than $1 trillion.
  • Lenders have increasingly been issuing loans under looser terms, known as “covenant-lite” arrangements. While these represented a fraction of issuance a decade ago, it is now more than 80% of the market.
  • An investment chief who runs $100 billion at J.P. Morgan told a briefing last week: “If you want to worry about something in the next two to three years, this is it.”

The central banks of the UK and Australia have both raised red flags about the rapid expansion of so-called leveraged loans and associated products that have invited comparisons to the toxic debt vehicles that triggered the global financial crisis.

In documents published just days apart, both the Reserve Bank of Australia and the Bank of England have expressed clear concern at the growth in leveraged loans, which have doubled in issuance since the GFC and now stand at over $1 trillion.

In addition, official statements from both central banks over the past week noted a weakening of lending standards for leveraged loans as the market has ballooned.

The RBA said this brought “additional risks”, while the BoE now intends to include leveraged loans into its financial stability “stress tests”, which model the ability of the financial system and the economy to withstand major shocks.

Major investors are also starting to warn about the lending products and their associated weak lending standards. In a presentation in London attended by Business Insider last week, Anton Pil, head of J.P. Morgan’s $100 billion alternatives investment arm, noted that private credit markets had “exploded in size” over recent years.

He compared it to a “shadow banking market” and said: “If you want to worry about something in the next two to three years, this is it.”

J.P. Morgan Asset Management

Leveraged loans are typically issued by non-bank lenders to companies that are risky borrowers or already highly indebted. The RBA noted there has been particularly strong demand for leveraged loans from special purpose vehicles that repackage them into collateralized loan obligations, or CLOs, to sell to investors — spreading the exposure further across the market in the process.

The pace of growth in leveraged loan issuance — fueled by investor appetite for risk — has been astonishing. In the minutes to its October Financial Policy Committee Meeting this week the BoE said the “global leveraged loan market was larger than – and was growing as quickly as – the US subprime mortgage market had been in 2006”.

Underlining the risks involved, the BoE said: “As with subprime mortgages, underwriting standards had weakened, there was significant uncertainty around the ultimate investors in collateralized loan obligation securitizations and hence their capacity to absorb losses, and borrowers would face higher financing costs if interest rates or credit spreads increased.”

‘Holding the bag’

The private loan market is largely unregulated relative to conventional bank lending, and as investor appetite for risk has remained strong in recent years there has been increasing issuance of private loans that offer much more limited protection to creditors in the event of default — or sometimes almost none.

While a conventional loan will include a covenant limiting what a borrower can do with its assets in the event of a default, the easier lending standards referred to by the central banks involve “covenant-lite” arrangements, known as “cov-lite” for short.

J.P. Morgan’s Pil said: “If you look back in 2007, we were worried about cov-lite debt in 2007, and that number was about a quarter of the market. Today, it’s almost 80%… If you want to worry about something in the next two or three years, this is it.”

To illustrate the impact of the more widespread use of cov-lite loans, Pil explained a traditional covenant was “a document that says I promise to not sell the chairs and the table without talking to you first. I’ll not sell the factory. I’m going to effectively have protections for you as the lender that I’m not going to start liquidating underlying assets, or somehow make your creditor position worse.

“When you have no covenants, I can take cash and distribute it all out. I can sell the assets of the company and you as a debt holder are holding the bag,” Pil said.

‘A shadow banking market’

The market, Pil said, consisted of “private entities, that buy and sell private, direct lending and debt to each other. Unregulated, generally. It’s a shadow market. I would argue it’s a shadow banking market.”

The concerns from the RBA and the BoE come just weeks after the Bank of International Settlements, also known as the “central bankers’ bank”, published research on leveraged loans last month.

The BIS noted default rates on the products had started to tick up — albeit only slightly — in the US, but added the Federal Reserve’s steady tightening of monetary policy could put further pressure on the system, because the interest rates on leveraged loans are typically floating relative to benchmark Treasury rates.

“The default rate of US institutional leveraged loans increased from around 2% in mid-2017 to 2.5% in June 2018,” the BIS said. “Going forward, as monetary policy normalizes, the floating rate feature of leveraged loans could trigger defaults by worsening borrowers’ debt coverage ratios (DCRs): the ratio of net operating income to debt service costs.icon Despite healthy corporate profits in the last few years, market participants have begun to report lower DCRs.”

The RBA’s financial stability review — a semi-annual in-depth look at issues that could pose major risks to the Australian financial system — was issued last Friday, and contained a dedicated section on the growth of non-bank lending. It said:

Non-financial corporate debt, relative to GDP, has been little changed in advanced economies in aggregate over the past few years. But in some countries, such as the United States and Canada, it has been rising strongly…. Firms with higher debt are more vulnerable to negative shocks; with a larger share of their profits used to pay their debt obligations, they are less able to withstand adverse shocks to profitability or interest rates.

In the United States, riskier commercial borrowers are among those to have increased their debt. In particular, leveraged loan issuance (loans to non-investment grade or already highly levered firms) has risen faster than aggregate debt in recent years, while high-yield bond issuance has remained at a high level. There has been particularly strong demand for leveraged loans from special purpose vehicles that repackage them into collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) to sell to investors. More than half of total leveraged loan issuance is purchased by CLOs. This may pose some additional risks, as securitized loans can be opaque for investors.
Growth in leveraged loans has also been accompanied by some weakening in non-price lending standards. The proportion of leveraged loans that have weaker contractual protections (‘covenant-lite’) has increased significantly in recent years.

The Bank of England went further, noting in its Record of the Financial Policy Committee meeting that the use of leveraged loans had been growing strong beyond North America, and was also a trend in the UK and Europe.

The minutes stated bluntly: “The Committee was concerned by the rapid growth of leveraged lending,” and continued:

In common with the US and Europe, high investor demand had driven strong growth in UK leveraged loans. Gross issuance of leveraged loans by UK non-financial companies had reached a record level of £38 billion in 2017 and a further £30 billion had already been issued in 2018. Taking high-yield bonds and leveraged loans together, the estimated stock of debt outstanding in UK non-investment grade firms was now estimated to account for about 20% of total UK corporate sector debt.

It also noted that “lending terms had loosened in the UK leveraged loan market while the proportion of UK leveraged loans with maintenance covenants had fallen from close to 100% in 2010 to around 20% currently”.

*The author travelled to London as a guest of J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales: There's going to be an 'enormous backlash' against Donald Trump's lies


Australian kids skipped school and said it was 'worth the detention' to see Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

$
0
0

Prince Harry Meghan Markle Australia Royal Tour

  • Students skipped school to meet Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as they visited Melbourne, Australia, on their royal tour.
  • The students held up a sign that said it was "worth the detention" in an effort to stand out to the royals.
  • Harry and Meghan were visiting Government House for an official reception but took time to mingle with members of the public outside.

Australian students skipped school to see Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and held up a sign that said it was "worth the detention" to see the royals.

The students waited for the Duke and Duchess to arrive at Government House in Melbourne on Wednesday. Harry and Meghan were there for an official reception with young leaders but took time to mingle with members of the public outside.

While thousands of people were waiting, those who said they had skipped school were arguably the cheekiest.

Prince Harry Meghan Markle Australia

The visit took place around 11 a.m., according to Australian outlet 9news— during the school day.

Thousands turned out to meet the royals.

Prince Harry Meghan Markle Australia tour

And many brought signs in the hope of attracting the royal couples' attention.

Royal tour Australia

The stop was part of Meghan and Harry's busy 16-day tour of Australia, Fiji, Tonga, and New Zealand. The trip is their first official royal tour.

They've already met a 98-year-old royal superfan and a rather indifferent koala bear in Sydney.

Harry also bonded with a five-year-old who liked his beard and Meghan showed off her cooking skills by making banana bread for a family whose farm they visited.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why horseshoe crab blood is so expensive

Beto O'Rourke says he may have gone 'a step too far' for calling Ted Cruz 'Lyin' Ted'

$
0
0

beto

  • Democratic Rep. Beto O'Rourke recently called Republican Sen. Ted Cruz "Lyin' Ted," the same nickname Donald Trump used against Cruz during the 2016 Republican primaries
  • O'Rourke said the disparaging remarks may have been made "in the heat of the moment."
  • "It's not something that I feel totally comfortable with," O'Rourke admitted.

Democratic Rep. Beto O'Rourke of Texas said that some of the disparaging remarks he made during a lively debate this week against his Republican rival, Sen. Ted Cruz, may have been made "in the heat of the moment."

Speaking at a televised CNN event in McAllen, Texas, on Thursday, O'Rourke recounted the debate with the incumbent senator earlier this week, in which he labeled Cruz as "Lyin' Ted."

"Senator Cruz won't be honest with you," O'Rourke said on Monday. "He's dishonest. It's why the president called him 'Lyin' Ted' and it's why the nickname stuck. Because it's true."

Cruz brushed off O'Rourke's remarks and said the fact that O'Rourke was reviving the nickname was "clear" evidence that "pollsters have told him to come out on the attack."

Donald Trump first gave Cruz that moniker during the contentious 2016 Republican primaries. That, among other things became one of the many sources of friction between the two during the general election that year.

Asked on Thursday how he felt about using the nickname, O'Rourke expressed some regret, but suggested it was an efficient way to dispel some of the falsehoods leveled against his campaign.

ted cruz

"There have been untold dollars spent on TV ads that are lies, that are dishonest, trying to scare you about me," O'Rourke said. "I decided that I can either spend the debate responding to every single dishonest thing that [Cruz] said, or I could make sure that everyone understood exactly what he's doing."

"It's not something that I feel totally comfortable with," O'Rourke admitted. "And perhaps in the heat of the moment, I took a step too far."

O'Rourke also denied Cruz's assertion that his use of the nickname was planned ahead of time, as suggested by pollsters.

"I don't know that that's the way I want to be talking in this campaign," O'Rourke said.

The race for the senate seat is hitting a fever pitch as early voting begins on Monday, the same day Trump is scheduled to headline a campaign rally for Cruz.

Despite lagging in polls, O'Rourke's campaign raked in over $38 million last quarter — more than the $18 million Trump made, and more than triple the $12 million Cruz took in.

A Quinnipiac University poll conducted earlier this month found Cruz leading by nine percentage points, while a New York Times Upshot/Siena College poll put Cruz ahead by 8 points.

SEE ALSO: 'Come on, Ted': Brutal political ad pokes fun at Ted Cruz's campaign slogan and reversal with Trump

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory

Rihanna rejected an offer to headline the 2019 Super Bowl halftime show out of support for Colin Kaepernick

$
0
0

rihanna

  • Rihanna is said to have turned down an offer to headline the Super Bowl halftime show in 2019, out of support for Colin Kaepernick, the former San Francisco 49ers quarterback who took a knee during the national anthem to call attention to police violence against people of color and racial injustice.
  • The pop-R&B singer was among several artists in the running for the headline slot at the 2019 Super Bowl.
  • The alternative-pop band Maroon 5 is set to take the halftime stage at the Super Bowl on February 3, 2019 in Atlanta.

Pop-R&B artist Rihanna is said to have turned down an offer to headline the Super Bowl halftime show in 2019, out of support for Colin Kaepernick, the former San Francisco 49ers quarterback, Us Weekly reported& on Thursday citing an unnamed source.

Kaepernick began taking a knee during the national anthem at NFL games in 2016 to call attention to racial injustice and police brutality.

Rihanna was among several artists in the running for headline slot. Representatives for the music star, the NFL, and CBS did not immediately respond to INSIDER's request for comment.

According to the Us Weekly report, Rihanna takes issue with the NFL's official stance on players who take a knee during the national anthem. NFL owners voted unanimously last May to require players on the field to stand for the anthem or face a fine, but recently, that policy appears to have been quietly swept under the rug.

Kaepernick filed a lawsuit against NFL owners in October 2017, alleging they colluded with each other to keep him out of the league because of his political views.

The alternative-pop band Maroon 5 will be the main halftime show performers at the Super Bowl in Atlanta on February 3.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory

LeBron James announced his arrival to the Lakers with a thunderous dunk

$
0
0

LeBron James

  • LeBron James didn't take long to make an impression as a Los Angeles Laker.
  • James threw down a thunderous dunk for his first points with his new franchise.
  • While the 2018 Lakers are still full of questions, there's little doubt that James is still the best player in basketball.


LeBron James didn't take long to announce his arrival in Los Angeles.

Just three minutes into his debut with the Showtime Lakers, James threw down a thunderous dunk that made clear he hadn't lost a step since his dominant days as a Cleveland Cavalier.

James' move to the Lakers was the biggest offseason transfer in recent NBA history.

While the team still has many question marks, James' first points with the franchise made a statement that the new era had begun.

There's still a long way to go before we can compare the "Meme Team" to the classic Showtime Lakers, but if James has anything to say about it, the Lakers will be heard from this season.

The rest of the Western Conference better take notice.

The King is still the King.

SEE ALSO: New Lakers teammate LeBron James inspires Kyle Kuzma on and off the court

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What it takes to be an NFL referee

Trump joked about a reporter getting body-slammed as the world waits to hear about the fate of missing Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi

$
0
0

Greg Gianforte

  • President Donald Trump on Thursday praised Republican Rep. Greg Gianforte and called him "my guy" for body slamming a journalist in 2017.
  • "And by the way, never wrestle him, you understand that? Never," Trump said at a campaign rally in Montana. "Any guy that can do a body slam, he's my guy."
  • Gianforte was captured on an audio recording physically assaulting Ben Jacobs, a reporter for the Guardian newspaper. "Greg Gianforte just body slammed me and broke my glasses," Jacobs tweeted shortly after the incident.
  • The encounter did little to hinder Gianforte in the Montana special election that month. He went on to defeat his Democratic opponent.
  • Trump's remarks come as new evidence supporting the theory that the US-based Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi was brutally killed in a Saudi Consulate in Turkey.

President Donald Trump on Thursday praised Republican Rep. Greg Gianforte and called him "my guy" for body-slamming a journalist and breaking his glasses during an incident in 2017.

Gianforte was captured on an audio recording physically assaulting Ben Jacobs, a reporter for the Guardian newspaper, in May 2017. 

"Greg Gianforte just body slammed me and broke my glasses," Jacobs tweeted shortly after the incident.

It happened at Gianforte's campaign headquarters in Bozeman, Montana, one day before residents headed to the polls for a special election in his district.

According to multiple witnesses at the time, Jacobs had asked Gianforte a question on a Congressional Budget Office report on the American Health Care Act before he was slammed to the ground.

Trump described Greg as "smart" and warned his audience not to antagonize the Republican lawmaker.

"And by the way, never wrestle him, you understand that? Never," Trump joked. "Any guy that can do a body slam, he's my guy."

"I shouldn't say ... there's nothing to be embarrassed about," Trump said to the cheering crowd.

Donald Trump

Trump also recounted how he initially heard about the incident, and why he believed it to be good news for Gianforte's campaign as voters headed to the polls.

"So I was in Rome with a lot of the leaders from other countries, talking about all sorts of things, when I heard about it," Trump said. "And we endorsed Greg very early. But I had heard he body slammed a reporter."

"And I said 'Oh, this is terrible. he's going to lose the election,'" Trump said before adding, "Then I said 'Well, wait a minute. I know Montana pretty well, I think it might help him.' And it did."

Gianforte pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor assault charge and was sentenced to 40 hours of community service and 20 hours of anger-management, in addition to the $385 in court fees and fines. The judge called Gianforte's actions "totally unacceptable" but gave him a six-month deferred sentence.

Despite the negative publicity, Gianforte went on to defeat Democrat Rob Quist by six percentage points in the Republican-leaning district.

Trump's comments on Thursday night prompted some criticism, including from Jacobs' publication.

"The President of the United States tonight applauded the assault on an American journalist who works for the Guardian," John Mulholland, US editor of The Guardian, said in a statement. "To celebrate an attack on a journalist who was simply doing his job is an attack on the First Amendment by someone who has taken an oath to defend it."

Trump's remarks on Gianforte's assault come amid new evidence surrounding the disappearance of the US-based Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi, who is feared to have been brutally killed inside the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul, Turkey.

Khashoggi is a Saudi native and legal US resident who lived in Virginia.

Khashoggi, an outspoken critic of Saudi Arabia and its leader, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, reportedly feared that his native county would retaliate against him. Saudi officials have denied his disappearance was a result of foul-play on their part.

"In the aftermath of the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, it runs the risk of inviting other assaults on journalists both here and across the world where they often face far greater threats," Mulholland added. "We hope decent people will denounce these comments and that the President will see fit to apologize for them."

SEE ALSO: 'I think he lost his damn mind': CNN commentator blasts GOP candidate after 'body-slamming' incident

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory

Viewing all 70894 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>